IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRCA/605/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:22363
NAFR
Digitally
signed by
ARPAN
ARPAN SRIVASTAVA
SRIVASTAVA Date: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
2026.05.15
13:51:32
+0530
MCRCA No. 605 of 2026
Sanjay Kumar Verma S/o Anand Ram Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o
Gali No. 3, Mahadev Nagar, Changora Bhanta, Raipur, District Raipur,
Chhattisgarh.
... Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The S H O Kumhari, District Durg,
Chhattisgarh.
... Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Advocate
For Non-applicant : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board
12.05.2026
1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant, who
is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime
No.154/2025 registered at Police Station Kumhari, District – Durg
(C.G.) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3),
##PAGE2##2
340(2), 111(2), 338, 61(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 major
“correspondence section in IPC is 420 and 34”.
2. Case of the prosecution case in brief is that the complainant
Radheshyam Verma, Tahsildar, Tahsil OfÏce Ahiwara, lodged a
written report alleging that certain persons fraudulently
misused User I.D. Code No. PAT430600016 allotted to Patwari
Krishna Kumar Sinha and prepared forged online revenue
records and land documents relating to lands situated at Village
Borsi, Chetua, Achhoti and Murmunda. During verification,
forged entries were found in Kisan Kitab and Khasra records in
the name of Pravin Kumar S/o Jaiprakash by using fabricated
documents and false signatures of the Patwari. Upon verification
from the Bhuiyan Portal and manual revenue records, the
documents were found forged and the forged entries were
subsequently deleted on the orders of the Sub-Divisional OfÏcer
(Revenue). It is alleged that the accused persons, in furtherance
of a criminal conspiracy, committed forgery and cheating by
preparing and using forged revenue documents, on the basis of
which Crime No.154/2025 was registered at Police Station
Kumhari, District Durg (C.G.) for offences punishable under
Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111(2), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023
corresponding to Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC.
##PAGE3##3
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case
solely on the basis of the memorandum statement of co-accused
Ganesh Tamboli and that he has neither prepared any forged
document nor received any amount in connection with the
alleged offence. It is further submitted that the alleged loan was
sanctioned by the concerned bank ofÏcials only after due
verification of the revenue records and no direct allegation of
cheating is made against the applicant. Counsel also submits
that the applicant is not absconding and is availing his legal
remedy before the Hon’ble Apex Court in Special Leave Petiton
(Crl.) Diary No.18547/2026, wherein it is directed that no coercive
steps shall be taken against the applicant. It is further submitted
that similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Amit Kumar
Maurya, Komal Chand Sahu, Ashok Kumar Uraon, Ganesh
Prasad Tamboli have already been granted bail by this Court vide
orders dated (24.02.2026, 03.03.2026, 03.03.2026,10.03.2026
passed in MCRC Nos. (1900/2026, 2097/2026, 2102/2026,
2241/2026) therefore, the present applicant is also entitled to
the benefit of parity.
4. Learned State counsel opposed the anticipatory bail application
submits that the allegations pertain to a well-planned conspiracy
##PAGE4##4
involving forged Khasra and land records for obtaining illegal
financial benefits. However, could not dispute the fact that co-
accused, namely, Amit Kumar Maurya, Komal Chand Sahu,
Ashok Kumar Uraon, Ganesh Prasad Tamboli have already been
granted bail by this Court and in Special Leave Petition (Crl.)
Diary No.18547/2026 preferred by the applicant before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court, it was directed that no coercive steps
shall be taken against the applicant.
5. I have heard learn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.