IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Appellant
Versus
RATTIRAM NARETI – Respondent
Judgment on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
1. Heard Mr. Ashish Shukla, learned Additional Advocate General for the appellant/State on I.A. No.01 of 2026, which is an application for condonation of delay of 696 days.
2. The State/appellant has preferred the instant application for grant of leave to appeal and appeal against the findings and judgment of acquittal dated 23.02.2024, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 05/2019, by the Court of learned First Additional Sessions Judge Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) whereby acquitting the respondent from the offence punishable under under Section 409 of the IPC in connection with Crime No. 45/2005 at Police Station- Charama, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.).
3. Learned counsel for the appellant / State submits that though the scope of interference with an order of acquittal is limited, the appellate Court nonetheless possesses wide powers of re-appreciation of evidence, and where such reappraisal reveals that the findings of acquittal are unjust, perverse or against the weight of evidence, the appellate Court is fully empowered to reverse the same. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Appellate Cour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.