IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SMT. SUNITA RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/2341/2026
##PAGE1##
1
Digitally 2026:CGHC:21933
signed
by
SHAYNA
KADRI NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2341 of 2026
1 - Smt. Sunita Rathore W/o Shri Murli Rathore Aged About 43 Years
R/o Village- Dongiya Portha Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District-
Sakti (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of
Mineral Resources Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal
Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Collector Sakti District- Sakti (C.G.)
3 - District Mining Officer Mining Department , District- Sakti (C.G.)
4 - Officer - In - Charge Police Station Hasoud District Sakti (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate
For State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate
##PAGE2##2
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
11/05/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner
challenging the seizure and continued detention of commercial
vehicles bearing registration Nos. CG 11 BV 9995 and CG 12 BG
1560 by the Mining Department and seeking their release from
custody. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed
for following reliefs:
“10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court be
pleased to direct the respondents to
place all the records of the case for kind
perusal of the Hon'ble Court.
10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased
to issue a direction to the Respondents
to immediately release the vehicles
bearing registration numbers CG 11 BV
9995 and CG 12 BG 1560 currently
detained at Police Station Hasoud,
District Sakti.
10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased
to issue an direction to the
Respondents to pay a sum of at least
Rs. 2.00 Lakh (Rupees Two Lakhonly)
as compensation to the Petitioner for
the illegal seizure, financial loss, and
mental harassment caused by the
arbitrary actions of the Mining
##PAGE3##3
Department.
10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased
to restrain the Respondents from taking
any further coercive action against the
Petitioner's vehicles in the absence of a
verified violation of the law.
10.5 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased
to grant any other relief which this
Hon'ble Court deems fit including the
cost of litigation to the petitioner from
the Respondents for the mental agony
and harassment.”
2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the petitioner is a small-
scale entrepreneur engaged in the business of transportation of
minerals and other goods for earning her livelihood. According to
the petitioner, she is the owner of commercial vehicles bearing
registration Nos. CG 11 BV 9995 and CG 12 BG 1560, which are
stated to be the sole source of income for the petitioner and are
presently under hypothecation with Axis Bank Ltd. and
Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Ltd.
respectively. It is further the case of the petitioner that vehicle
bearing registration No. CG 11 BV 9995 was purchased vide Tax
Invoice dated 10.02.2026 and vehicle bearing registration No. CG
12 BG 1560 is also duly registered and financed through a
financial institution. According to the petitioner, both the vehicles
were being operated through duly licensed drivers possessing
##PAGE4##4
valid driving licences issued by the competent authority. The
petitioner has further averred that on 21.04.2026, vehicle No. CG
11 BV 9995 had gone to Marghatti Sand Ghat for collection of
sand and at the relevant time the vehicle was empty and was
allegedly carrying a valid Mineral Transit Pass bearing No.
9956515 issued in favour of the lease holder. Similarly, on the
same date, vehicle No. CG 12 BG 1560 was also allegedly seized
by the Mining Department while it was empty and was
accompanied by a valid Mineral Transit Pass bearing No.
9956516. According to the petitioner, despite the vehicles being
empty and despite possession of valid royalty passes, the Mining
Department illegally seized the vehicles and thereafter the same
were kept at Police Station Hasoud. It is further stated that the
petitioner submitted affidavits and thereafter a detailed
representation dated 28.04.20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.