##PAGE1##

1

Digitally

signed

2026:CGHC:21937

by

SHAYNA

KADRI

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 2343 of 2026

1 - Kheersagar Netam S/o Ganga Prasad Netam, Aged About 46 Years

R/o Village Gaontiyapara Gudeli, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-

Bilaigarh (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of

Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Capitol

Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2 - The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

3 - The Tahsildar, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.)

4 - Revenue Inspector, Village Vijaypur, R.N.M. - Boirdadar, Tahsil And

District Raigarh (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)

For Petitioner : Ms. Ruchika Agrawal, Advocate

For State : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer

2

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

11/05/2026

1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for

following reliefs:

“a. A writ and/or an order in the nature

of appropriate writ directing the

Respondent authorities more

particularly Respondent appropriately

No.3 and conclude proceeding being to

5 act to the demarcation Case Revenue

No. unregistered/A-12/2025-26

[Annexure P-3(Colly)] (initiated by way

of application dated 11.12.2025) in

accordance with law, within a time

bound manner, as directed by this

Hon'ble Court.

b. Any other relief which this Hon'ble

Court may deem fit in with the facts &

circumstances of case.”

2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the petitioner is the owner

of land bearing Khasra No. 21/4 admeasuring 0.405 hectare

situated at village Vijaypur, P.H. No. 54, RNM Boirdadar, Tahsil

and District Raigarh (C.G.). According to the petitioner, the

aforesaid land was purchased from its erstwhile owner namely

Kuleshwar Singh Dau by way of registered sale deed dated

24.02.2025 registered on 25.02.2025 for a valuable sale

3

consideration of Rs.40 Lakhs. It is further the case of the

petitioner that after execution of the sale deed, the name of the

petitioner was duly mutated and recorded in the relevant revenue

records including B-1, P-II, Khasra Panchshala and Rin

Pustika/Kisan Kitab. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an

application dated 11.12.2025 before the competent authority

under Section 125 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code

seeking demarcation of the boundaries of the aforesaid land. It

has also been stated that requisite fee for demarcation was duly

deposited along with the said application. The petitioner has

further stated that pursuant to the said application, the Tahsildar,

Raigarh registered Revenue Case No. unregistered/A-12/2025-26

and vide order dated 12.12.2025 called for a demarcation report

from the concerned Revenue Inspector and Patwari which was to

be submitted by 30.12.2025. A memorandum in this regard was

also issued on 12.12.2025. According to the petitioner, thereafter

despite repeated visits to the office of Tahsildar, Raigarh and

repeated inquiries regarding progress of the matter, no further

proceedings were undertaken by the respondent authorities and

only oral assurances were given that the matter would be

concluded shortly. The petitioner has further averred that upon

obtaining certified copies of the proceedings, it came to his

knowledge that after 12.12.2025 no progress had been recorded

in the order sheet and no further action had been taken in the

demarcation proceedings. Being aggrieved by such inaction on

4

the part of the respondent authorities, the petitioner has

approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite filing of the

application for demarcation on 11.12.2025 and despite issuance

of memorandum by the Tahsildar calling for report from the

Revenue Inspector and Patwari, no effective steps have been

taken by the respondent authorities for concluding the

demarcation proceedings. It is contended that due to prolonged

pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner is unable to peacefully

enjoy and utilize t