SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 16621

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Bibhu Datta Guru, J
MD. SHAHBAZ SIDDIQUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF C.G. – Respondent
WPS No. 3962 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Megha Mishra
For the Respondents: Y.S. Thakur

A writ petition seeking direct relief is generally premature and not maintainable if the petitioner's representation or application is still pending consideration before the competent authority, absent any exceptional circumstances.

Headnote:The petitioner, a police constable, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to release a mediclaim reimbursement of Rs. 3,55,014/- for medical expenses incurred for the treatment of his wife and newborn child. The court found that the petitioner had submitted an application for reimbursement on 25.04.2026, which was still pending consideration before the competent authority. The primary issue was whether a writ petition for direct relief is maintainable when a representation is still pending before the competent authority. The court reasoned that "ordinarily a writ petition seeking direct relief would not be maintainable unless exceptional circumstances are made out" when a final decision on a pending application has not yet been taken. Accordingly, the Writ Petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed as premature, with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if his application is not decided within a reasonable period.

Table of Content
1. request for medical reimbursement for family treatment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. prematurity of petition due to pending application. (Para 3)
3. verification of pending status of representation. (Para 4 , 5)
4. non-maintainability of writ petitions for pending representations. (Para 6 , 7)
5. dismissal of premature petition with liberty to re-approach. (Para 8)

Order on Board

1. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

“i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the application dated 25.04.2026 submitted by the petitioner and release the amount of mediclaim of the petitioner.

ii. That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working on the post of Constable and presently posted at Reserve Police Centre, Rajnandgaon. It is submitted that the wife of the petitioner was suffering from serious ailments during pregnancy and was admitted for treatment at Ahmedabad, Gujarat and the newly born child of the petitioner was also under treatment there. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner incurred medical expenses amounting to Rs.3,55,014/- towards treatment of his wife and child and thereafter submitted an application dated 25.04.2026 before the competent authority seeking reimbursement/mediclaim amount, however, till date no action has been taken thereupon. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

3. On the other hand, learned State counsel would submit that the application submitted by the petitioner is still pending consideration before the competent authority and no final decision has yet been taken thereupon. He would further submit that without awaiting any response from the authorities and within a short span of time, the petitioner has hurriedly approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition and, therefore, the same is premature and not maintainable at this stage.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents appended thereto.

5. From the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner submitted the application dated 25.04.2026 before the competent authority seeking release of mediclaim/reimbursement amount and, without awaiting any decision thereupon, has approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition within a short span of time. No material has been brought on record to demonstrate that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected by the competent authority or that the respondents have refused to consider the same.

6. It is well settled that when a representation/application submitted by a petitioner is pending consideration before the competent authority and no final decision has yet been taken thereupon, ordinarily a writ petition seeking direct relief would not be maintainable unless exceptional circumstances are made out. In the present case, no such exceptional circumstance has been pointed out warranting interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

7. In the considered opinion of this Court, since the application submitted by the petitioner is still pending consideration before the competent authority and no final decision has yet been taken thereupon, the present Writ Petition is premature and not maintainable at this stage.

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed as premature, with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if his application is not decided within a reasonable period. No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top