IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DR. MAHAVIR SINGH JOWHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPS/8000/2022
##PAGE1##
1
NIRMALA
RAO
2026:CGHC:21463
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 8000 of 2022
1 - Dr. Mahavir Singh Jowhary, S/o Dr. S N Jowhary, Aged About 48 Years R/o
Aminpara, Puranibasti, Police Station, Puranibasti, Raipur, District - Raipur
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Health And Family Welfare
Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2 - Directorate, Health Services, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Through -
Director, Health Services, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3 - Chief Medical Officer And Medical Officer, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4 - Civil Surgeon, District Hospital, Durg, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh
5 - Joint Director, Directorate, Health Services, Raipur, District - Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
6 - Chief Medical Officer And Medical Officer, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner/s : Ms. Surya Kawalkar Dangi, Advocate.
For Respondents/ State : Shri Abhuday Tripathi, P.L.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Judgment On Board
##PAGE2##2
07.05.2026
1) By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:-
“I. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to set aside the orders dated
03.07.2021 (Annexure P/1) and order dated
29.07.2021 (Annexure P/2) as illegal.
II. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 and 2 to
grant place of posting to the petitioner, in light
of his qualifications.
III. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 and 2 to
treat the period since 19.03.2016 as period on
duty.
IV. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 and 2 to
grant the petitioner arrears of pay and grant
him timely promotions.
V. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court
deems, fit in the facts and circumstances may
also be granted in favour of the petitioner.”
2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner was appointed on the post of Medical Officer (M.S.
Surgery) in the year 2006 and subsequently, acquired the degree
of DNB (Neuro Surgery) in the year 2014. She would submit that
in the year 2015, the petitioner was posted as a Medical Officer at
Community Health Centre, Abhanpur. Thereafter, his services
were transferred from Abhanpur to District Hospital, Durg, Trauma
Centre vide order order 30.10.2015. It is contended that as no
relieving order was issued by respondent No.3, the petitioner
##PAGE3##3
could not join his duties at the transferred place pursuant to the
order of transfer, therefore, the petitioner approached respondent
No.1 and vide letter dated 14.3.2016, the Civil Surgeon, Durg was
directed to permit the petitioner to join his services. She would
argue that the petitioner submitted his joining application before
respondent No.4 on 19.3.2016 but he was asked to submit the
same alongwith a relieving order. She would submit that the
petitioner wandered from pillar to post, but no heed was paid to
his grievance, and ultimately, an order has been passed by
respondent No.1 on 29.7.2021, whereby the services of the
petitioner came to an end pursuant to provisions of Rule 11 of the
Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 2010 (for short ‘Leave
Rules, 2010’). It was stated that the petitioner had remained
absent from service. She would submit that the petitioner has
placed sufficient documents on record to demonstrate that there
was no mistake on his part. The petitioner repeatedly approached
the respondent authorities but respondent No.3 failed to issue a
relieving order, therefore, he was not permitted to join his duties at
the transferred place. It is also submitted that respondent No.1
also issued directions to respondents No.3 & 4, but no heed was
paid and subsequently, respondent No.1 itself passed the
impugned order whereas, the authority concerned was aware of
all the facts and circumstances of the case. She would pray to
allow this petition.
##PAGE4##4
3) On the other hand, learned counsel for the State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.