SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 16902

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PIYUSH VAISHNAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


1 - Piyush Vaishnav S/o Lakhan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 35 Years,

R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word

No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli

Chhattisgarh

2 - Smt. Kanti Vaishnav W/o Lakhan Vaishnav, Aged About 65 Years,

R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word

No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli

Chhattisgarh

3 - Lakhan Das Vaishnav S/o Meghidas Vaishnav, Aged About 72 Years,

R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word

No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli

Chhattisgarh

4 - Harish Kumar Vaishnav S/o Lakhan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 48

Years, R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet),

Word No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli

Chhattisgarh

5 - Smt. Linima Vaishnav W/o Harish Vaishnav, Aged About 40 Years,

R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word

No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli

Chhattisgarh

6 - Smt. Ritu @ Maya Vaishnav W/o Sharad Chand Vaishnav, Aged

About 45 Years, R/o Plot No. 52, Ward No. 14, Shriram Residency

V.T.C. Bilaspur, Police Station

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top