IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PIYUSH VAISHNAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
1 - Piyush Vaishnav S/o Lakhan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word
No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
2 - Smt. Kanti Vaishnav W/o Lakhan Vaishnav, Aged About 65 Years,
R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word
No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
3 - Lakhan Das Vaishnav S/o Meghidas Vaishnav, Aged About 72 Years,
R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word
No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
4 - Harish Kumar Vaishnav S/o Lakhan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 48
Years, R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet),
Word No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
5 - Smt. Linima Vaishnav W/o Harish Vaishnav, Aged About 40 Years,
R/o Rajendra Nagar (wrongly not mentioned in the order-sheet), Word
No. 7 Mungeli, Police Station -City Kotwali, District -Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
6 - Smt. Ritu @ Maya Vaishnav W/o Sharad Chand Vaishnav, Aged
About 45 Years, R/o Plot No. 52, Ward No. 14, Shriram Residency
V.T.C. Bilaspur, Police Station
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.