Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
M/S HARI OM PLASTIC – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Judgment On Board
(05/05/2026)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
For sake of exposition, this Judgment is divided in following parts:-
| S.No. | Particulars | Page Nos. |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | The Appeal | 2 |
| 2. | Quintessential Facts | 3 |
| 3. | Finding of the Commercial Court | 4 |
| 4. | Submissions on behalf of the Appellant | 4 |
| 5. | Submissions on behalf of the Respondent RDA | 5 |
| 6. | Provision relating to Condonation of Delay | 5 |
| 7. | Finding and Analysis | 12 |
| 8. | Conclusion | 15 |
The Appeal
1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the Act of 1996’), the appellant herein has preferred this appeal calling in question legality, validity and correctness of order dated 2-5-2025 passed by the Commercial Court (District Judge Level), Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur in Arbitration MJC No.12/2025, by which the appellant’s objection application under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 has been rejected finding no merit.
2. The aforesaid challenge has been made on the following factual backdrop: -
Quintessential Facts
3. The respondent Raipur Development Authority (RDA) issued Notice Inviting Tender for allotment of commercial plots on lease for 30 years at Deven
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
