IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DIGAMBAR LAL SATNAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
2026:CGHC:20609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 20 of 2008 Digambar Lal Satnami S/o Paras Ram Satnami, aged about 30 years, Occupation – Labour, R/o Village Parasadeeh, P.S.-Jaijaipur, Distt.-
Janjgir-Champa, C.G.
... Appellant versus State Of Chhattisgarh through Police Station Kotra Road, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG)
... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr. Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Judgment on Board (04th May, 2026)
The appellant in this appeal calls in question the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.12.2007 passed by III Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Raigarh in ST No.52/2006 whereby the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:
Conviction Sentence Under Section 398 of Indian Penal RI for 07 years Code.
Under Section 427 of Indian Penal RI for 02 years Code.
Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
02. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 16.11.2005 complainant Peela Dau, Incharge Branch Manager of Rural Bank, Branch-Nandeli, was working in the bank and at that time cashier Jitendra Dubey, Manoj Shrivas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.