SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 17317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MANORANJAN PRASAD PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
APOORVA SHUKLA (Died and Deleted) – Respondent


2026:CGHC:20562 NAFR RAHUL JHA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.05.01 17:27:56 +0530 SA No. 847 of 2019 Manoranjan Prasad Pandey S/o Late Mokar Prasad Pandey Aged About 45 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Baikunthpur Raigarh, Tehsil And Dist.

Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh .Appellant(s)

Versus

1 - Apoorva Shukla (Died And Deleted) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated-

09-04-2026)

2 - Smt. Pratibha Mishra W/o Sanjeev Mishra Aged About 38 Years R/o House No. 20/5, Compadresidency, Behind Capital Petrol Pump, Raisen Road Bhopal Madhya Pradesh.

3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh .Respondent(s)

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For Resp No. 2 : Mr. Barun Kumar Chakrabarty, Advocate For Resp No. 3 : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Judgment on Board

01/05/2026

1. The present Second Appeal has been preferred under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the plaintiff, who is the appellant herein, calling in question the judgment and decree date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top