Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMSHANKAR PATEL – Appellant
Versus
SMT. PUSHPALATA PATEL – Respondent
C.A.V. Judgment
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
For sake of exposition, this Judgment is divided in following parts:-
| S.No. | Particulars | Page Nos. |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | The Appeal | 2 |
| 2. | Quintessential Facts | 3 |
| 3. | Issues and Findings therein | 4 |
| 4. | Findings and Judgment of the Family Court | 5 |
| 5. | Submission on behalf of the Appellant/Plaintiff | 5 |
| 6. | Submission on behalf of the Respondent/Defendant | 6 |
| 7. | Points for Determination | 6 |
| 8. | Legal provision governing Void marriages | 7 |
| 9. | Legal Analysis and Reasoning | 16 |
| 10. | Point No.1 | 16 |
| 11. | Point No.2 | 17 |
| 12. | Issue of Permanent Alimony | 21 |
| 13. | Conclusion and Relief/Cost | 22 |
The Appeal
1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the appellant herein/plaintiff has preferred this appeal calling in question legality, validity and correctness of judgment & decree dated 3-1-2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa in Civil Suit No.117 A/2023, by which his application for declaring the marriage as null and void under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act of 1955’), has been dismissed finding no merit.
(For the sake of convenience, p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
