IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PIONEER CHEMICAL COMPANY (A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/1966/2025
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:20403-DB
Digitally signed
by SAGRIKA
SAGRIKA AGRAWAL
AGRAWAL Date:
2026.05.02
11:30:51 +0530
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 1966 of 2025
Pioneer Chemical Company (A Proprietorship Firm) Through- Its
Proprietor Namely Subodh Kumar Bansal Son Of Harish Kumar Bansal,
Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of 286/7, Ahiwara Road, Kumhari,
Block Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Special Secretary, Department
Of Commercial Tax (Excise), Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa
Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance,
Government Of India, North Block, New Delhi.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. A.G.
For Respondent No. 2 : Mr Rishabh Dev Singh, Advocate on
behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Advocate
##PAGE2##2
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
01.05.2026
1. Heard Mr. Shikhar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also
heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. Advocate General for the
Respondent No. 1/ State and Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh, on behalf of
Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned counsel for Respondent No. 2/
UOI.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking
following relief:-
10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to
call for the entire records pertaining to the present
case.
10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to
hold and declare that the impugned enactment i.e.
Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules,
2022 (Annexure P-1) is ultra vires to the Constitution
of India.
10.3 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also
kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this
Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the
case.
3. It has been pointed out by learned counsel appearing for the
parties that in an identical matter bearing WPC No. 3580 of 2022
(M/s. Kedia Trading Versus State Of Chhattisgarh & Another)
##PAGE3##3
and other connected matter, had allowed the petition, vide order
dated 27.03.2026 and observing as follows:-
“44. It is not at all in dispute that Molasses is a by-
product of sugar industry and it is not fit for human
consumption in its raw form. It further does not contain
alcohol and becomes capable of producing alcohol
only after fermentation. As such, the Molasses cannot
per se be equated with "Intoxicant', 'intoxicating liquor'
or 'exisable article' as defined under the Excise Act.
The Excise Act is a legislation dealing with intoxicating
liquor and intoxicating drugs. Therefore, bringing
Molasses within the regulatory fold of the Excise Act,
without statutory backing, is impermissible. The State's
attempt to regulate Molasses on the ground that it may
be used for producing alcohol amounts to over-
extension of legislative power. Accepting such a
contention would permit the State to regulate any
substance capable of fermentation, which is
constitutionally impermissible. The State relies on
Section 8(c) of the Excise Act, which refers to "any
other base" used for manufacture of liquor. This Court
is unable to accept that the expression "any other
base" can be stretched to include molasses in its raw,
non-intoxicant form. Such interpretation would override
the definition provisions, expand the Act beyond its
##PAGE4##4
object, and further violate settled principles of statutory
interpretation. Section 62 of the Excise Act empowers
the State to make rules to carry out the provisions of
the Act. It is a settled principle that rules cannot
enlarge the scope of the parent statute. The Rules of
2022 extend control to non-intoxicant uses, impose
licensing and duty, regulate ordinary trade activity. This
clearly travels beyond the scope of the Excise Act and
is therefore ultra vires. A plain reading of the Rules
shows two categories: use for distillation (valid domain
of State), and use for industrial, agricultural, cattle feed
etc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.