IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SMT. RAM BAI – Appellant
Versus
RAMSABAD SINGH – Respondent
WP227/508/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:20030
Digitally signed
by SAGRIKA
SAGRIKA AGRAWAL
AGRAWAL Date:
2026.05.04 NAFR
18:17:53 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 508 of 2026
1 - Smt. Ram Bai Wd/o Late Thakurdayal Kurre, Aged About 59 Years
R/o Village Satpata, Police Station Bishrampur, Tahsil And District
Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
2 - Ku. Neera Kurre D/o Late Thakurdayal Kurrey Aged About 34 Years
R/o Village Satpata, Police Station Bishrampur, Tahsil And District
Surajpur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Ramsabad Singh S/o Nandkishore Singh, Aged About 49 Years R/o
Village Shivnandanpur, Police Station Bishrampur, District Surajpur,
Chhattisgarh. .. ( Driver Of Offending Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration
No. C.G. – 15-Cx-5691)
2 - Rakesh Rai S/o Akhileshwar Ram Rai, Aged About 25 Years R/o
Minus Colony Bishrampur, Ward No. 06, Police Station Bishrampur,
District - Surajpur, Chhattisgarh --- ( Owner Of Offending Vehicle Truck
Bearing Registration No. C.G. 15-Cx-5691)
3 - Branch Manager H.D.F.C, Branch Surajpur, District Surajpur,
Chhattisgarh --- (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Truck Bearing
Registration No. C.G.-15-Cx-5691)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advocate
##PAGE2##2
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board
29/04/2026
1 Heard.
2 The present writ petitioner under article 227 of the Constitution of
India, filed by the petitioner against the order dated 07.10.2024 whereby
the application filed by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 2 of CPC has
been rejected.
3 Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the
petitioners had earlier prosecuting a claim case before the learned 2nd
Addl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Surajpur (hereinafter referred as
“Claims Tribunal”) bearing Claim Case No. 54/2018 for compensation
on account of death of Dinesh Kurre who is the son of the petitioner No.
1 and brother of the petitioner No. 2. In the said claim case, award was
passed on 30.07.2018 and an amount of Rs.5,16,000/- was awarded in
favour of the petitioners. Being dissatisfied by the quantum of the
compensation, the petitioners had filed an appeal bearing MAC No.
1685/2018 before this Court. The said appeal was disposed of vide
order dated 07.03.2024 and remitted the matter back to the learned
Claims Tribunal permitting the Respondent No. 3/ Insurance Company
to file their written statement and the appellants to amend their
pleadings and to led their evidences. Thereafter, the learned Claims
Tribunal has dismissed the claim case for non-compliance of the orders
with respect to issuance of notices to the non-applicants and non
payment of process fee for them vide order dated 23.09.2024. When
##PAGE3##3
the petitioners came to know about dismissal of their claim case, they
filed their application for restoration of the same under Order 9 Rule 2 of
CPC, however, the said application has also been dismissed. Which is
under challenge in the present writ petition.
4 He would further submit that the present is a claim case which
may not be dismissed on technical ground as the petitioners suffered
loss of the son of petitioner No. 1 and brother of petitioner No. 2. The
Motor Vehicles Act is a beneficial law and the petitioners are entitled for
compensations and since from the date of accident i.e. 31.01.2018 till
date they have not received any amount of compensation and their
claim application is dismissed on the technical ground. The petitioners
being the less literate persons, there was lack of communication
between them and their counsel before the learned Claims Tribunal,
their claim case was dismissed, the petitioners want to prosecute their
claim case vigilantly and therefore, the same may be restored in its
original number by allowing their application under Order 9 Rule 2 of
CPC.
5 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the
material annexed with the petition.
6 The facts of the case are not in dispute that in the Claim Case No.
54/2018, an award was passed in favour of the petitioners vide award
dated 30.07.2018.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.