SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 17771

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
SMT. URMILA TANDIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC No. 2472 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Siddharth Dubey
For the Respondents: S. S. Choubey

The court mandated the timely disposal of pending applications for forest rights under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, emphasizing that administrative inaction regarding livelihood-linked land rights should be resolved within a fixed timeframe.

Headnote:The case pertains to the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. The petitioners, belonging to the Scheduled Tribes category, sought the grant of forest authority letters (Van Adhikar Patra) for 5 acres of land in Village Sarbahara, having submitted an application on 10.12.2014 and a reminder on 26.07.2021. The court found that the respondent authorities had failed to take a decision on the pending applications. The primary issue was whether the prolonged inaction of the respondent authorities in deciding the application for forest rights was arbitrary and prejudicial to the petitioners' livelihood. The court observed that in the interest of justice, it is appropriate to direct the concerned authorities to consider and decide the application expeditiously. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

Table of Content
1. claim for forest rights by scheduled tribes under the 2006 act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arbitrariness of prolonged administrative inaction on statutory applications. (Para 3 , 4)
3. judicial mandate for time-bound disposal of pending forest right claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)

Order on Board

1. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition seeking following relief(s):-

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the appropriate respondent authorities to grant forest authority letter (Van Adhikar Patra)/Patta to the petitioners concerning the land bearing khasra no. 998. P.H. No. 20, to extent of 5 Acre land situated at Village Sarbahara, Tahsil Pendra-road, Revenue District Gaurela-Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.).

10.2 Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience may also be passed in instant petition.”

2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the petitioners are residents of Gram Sarbahara, Tahsil Pendra Road, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.), and belong to the category of Scheduled Tribes, thereby being governed by the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. The petitioners claim to be in possession of land bearing Khasra No. 998, P.H. No. 20, admeasuring about 5 acres, and are dependent upon the said land for their livelihood. It is the case of the petitioners that they had submitted an application dated 10.12.2014 before the competent authorities seeking grant of forest rights/patta (Van Adhikar Patra) in respect of the said land. Thereafter, a reminder representation dated 26.07.2021 was also submitted, which bears acknowledgment of the concerned authority. Apart from this, the petitioners have made several representations before different authorities, including the Gram Sabha and the Additional Collector, however, no decision has been taken on their application till date. Being aggrieved by such inaction, the petitioners have approached this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite filing an application as far back as 10.12.2014 for grant of patta/lease under the Forest Rights Act, the same has not been decided till date. It is further submitted that even a reminder dated 26.07.2021 was submitted, which is evident from the receipt of the concerned authority, yet no action has been taken. It is contended that such prolonged inaction on the part of the respondent authorities is arbitrary and has seriously prejudiced the rights and livelihood of the petitioners, who are dependent upon the said land. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that appropriate directions be issued to the authorities to decide the pending application expeditiously.

4. Learned State counsel submits that considering the date of the application, it appears that the same might have already been decided by the competent authority. However, appropriate directions may be issued in this regard.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that the grievance of the petitioners pertains to non-consideration of their application for grant of forest rights/patta, which was initially submitted on 10.12.2014 and followed by a reminder dated 26.07.2021.

6. Be that as it may, in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to direct the concerned authorities to take a decision on the said application. Accordingly, the concerned authority is directed to consider and decide the application of the petitioners for grant of patta/lease in respect of the forest land, if the same has not already been decided, within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, and to communicate the outcome thereof to the petitioners forthwith.

7. The petitioners are directed to submit a copy of this order before the concerned authorities within a period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top