SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 17822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Runa Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPC No. 2834 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Goutam Khetrapal
For the Respondents: Shashank Thakur

A writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, is not maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy of appeal is available under Section 44 before the Sub Divisional Officer.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Tehsildar under S.248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, directing the removal of encroachment from land allegedly purchased by the petitioner via a registered sale deed. The Court considered the jurisdictional issue regarding the alternative remedy available under the statute. The main issue was whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the availability of a statutory appeal. The Court held that since the impugned order passed under S.248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 is appealable under S.44 before the Sub Divisional Officer, the petitioner must exhaust the statutory remedy. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal within 15 days, with a direction to the appellate authority to decide the stay application within a further period of 15 days.

Table of Content
1. challenge to encroachment removal orders based on property title claims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. objection regarding maintainability due to availability of alternative statutory remedy. (Para 3)
3. court directs petitioner to exhaust available appellate remedies under administrative law. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

Order On Board

1. This writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 19.05.2026 passed by the Tehsildar, Bhilai 3, District Durg in Revenue Case No.202602101600021 A-68 by which the petitioner has been directed to remove her encroachment from the land bearing khasra No.398 admeasuring 1200 sq.ft. situated at village Charoda, Tahsil Bhilai 3, District Durg.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had purchased the subject property through registered sale deed in the year 2011, which is reflected from the copy of sale deed at Annexure P/3 and she constructed her house on the purchased property and has been residing there on. He would further submit that without considering the relevant document the Tehsildar, Bhilai 3, District Durg has passed the order by invoking the jurisdiction under Section 248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 and directed the petitioner to remove her encroachment from the said land. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition for quashing of the impugned order dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P/1).

3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State has raised an objection that the Tahsildar has passed the impugned order under Section 248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 which is appealable before the Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, as provided under Section 44 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code and the statutory remedy of filing an appeal is available to the petitioner and therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable.

4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that impugned order dated 19.05.2026 passed by the Tahsildar, Bhilai 3, District Durg is appealable before the Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Bhilai 3, District Durg under Section 44 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to approach before the concerned Sub Divisional Officer by filing a statutory appeal within 15 days from today and till then the interest of the petitioner may be protected.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Bhilai 3, District Durg within 15 days from today and in such eventuality the concerned Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue shall decide the interim application for grant of stay within further period of 15 days from the date of filing of appeal by the petitioner before it in accordance with law on its own merits. If the petitioner fails to file the appeal within the stipulated time frame, this order shall lose its efficacy.

6. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top