SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 23357

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
Murlidhar Bagh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
MCRC No. 6797 of 2026



Important Points

In bail applications involving matrimonial cruelty leading to suicide, prima facie evidence of harassment and aggravating factors, such as the pregnancy of the deceased, outweigh procedural delays in FIR registration, which are matters for trial.

Subject

Criminal Law - Bail Application

Act Referred

Headnote

(A) Bail - Matrimonial Cruelty - Suicide of pregnant wife - Prima facie evidence of continuous physical and mental harassment for dowry (motorcycle) and the fact that the deceased was pregnant at the time of suicide aggravates the gravity of the offence, justifying the rejection of bail. (Para 7)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Bail Application - Delay in FIR and discrepancies in initial statements - Such factors are matters to be examined during the course of trial and cannot be conclusively appreciated at the stage of consideration of bail. (Para 7)

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the allegations of dowry-related cruelty leading to the suicide of his pregnant wife.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kishore Narayan
For the Respondents: Smriti Shrivastava

Order on Board

1 This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 156/2026 registered at Police Station Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 80(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2 As per the prosecution story, in brief, on the basis of merg intimation regarding the death of deceased by hanging on 03.12.2025, Merg No.112/2025 was registered and enquiry was initiated. During the course of enquiry, it surfaced that the marriage between the deceased and the present applicant was solemnized about three years prior to the incident and out of their wedlock, a female child was born. It is alleged that after the marriage, the applicant and his family members continuously subjected the deceased to physical and mental cruelty on account of demand of a motorcycle as dowry. The applicant allegedly abused and assaulted the deceased on several occasions and had even attempted to strangulate her earlier. It is further alleged that on the night preceding the incident, i.e., on 02.12.2025, the applicant again quarreled with and assaulted the deceased over the demand of a motorcycle and threatened to leave her permanently at her parental home. Owing to such continuous harassment and cruelty, the deceased committed suicide by hanging herself on 03.12.2025. During investigation, statements of the deceased's family members as well as independent witnesses of Village Manki were recorded, who supported the allegations regarding persistent dowry demand and cruelty. On the basis of the merg enquiry, FIR was registered on 31.03.2026 for the offence under Section 80(2) of the BNS. The applicant was arrested on 01.04.2026 and after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed.

3 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the incident had taken place on 03.12.2025, whereas the FIR came to be registered only on 31.03.2026 after an unexplained delay of nearly four months. It is further submitted that during the merg enquiry, statements of the mother, father, brother, sister-in-law and neighbouring witnesses of the deceased were recorded immediately after the incident, wherein none of them alleged any demand of dowry or motorcycle by the applicant. According to learned counsel, the allegation of dowry demand surfaced for the first time only in the subsequent statements recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS. He further submits that no suicide note or dying declaration has been recovered and the postmortem report does not disclose any external injury on the body of the deceased.

4 Learned counsel further submits that the applicant happens to be the husband of the deceased, their marriage was solemnized in the year 2022 and a female child was born out of the wedlock. It is submitted that for almost two years the matrimonial relationship between the parties remained cordial. According to him, the deceased was under mental stress because whenever she used to speak with her parental family over the phone, the applicant would tell her that he would leave her at her parental home permanently, due to which she became mentally disturbed and ultimately committed suicide by hanging herself. It is further submitted that the applicant is the sole earner of the family, he has no criminal antecedents, charge-sheet has already been filed, he is in judicial custody since 01.04.2026 and no further custodial interrogation is required. Therefore, he prays that the applicant be enlarged on regular bail.

5 On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail and submits that the deceased committed suicide on account of continuous physical and mental harassment meted out to her by the present applicant in connection with the unlawful de

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top