SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 25205

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Himanshu Ragde – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 6060 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Saket Pandey
For the Respondents: Hariom Rai, S.S. Baghel

The court directed the respondent authorities to consider and decide upon the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment in accordance with the law within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate Appointment - Decision on Representation - Petitioner seeking direction for respondents to decide on representation for compassionate appointment; Court directs respondents to decide in accordance with law within three months. (Para 5)

Issues: Whether the respondents should be directed to decide on the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment.

Order on Board

1. By the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

“10.1.That, the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner, may be kindly called for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to decide the representations / applications of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment, in the interest of justice.

10.3 That any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage, petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment.

3. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 opposes the submission of learned counsel for petitioner.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. As petitioner has already submitted representation and according to him, representation was not considered and decided, therefore, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing respondents No.2 and 3 to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top