SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 25594

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Surendra Singh Paul – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 5869 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Saket Pandey
For the Respondents: Vivek Verma, Shaleen Singh Baghel

The court directed the respondent authorities to decide a pending representation for compassionate appointment in accordance with law within a specified period (30 days) following an undue delay in processing the application.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate Appointment - Pending Representation - Direction to decide - Where an application for compassionate appointment remains pending for a considerable period, the Court may direct the competent authority to consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a stipulated timeframe. (Para 5)

Issues: Whether the respondent authorities should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending representation for compassionate appointment.

Order on Board

1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide his pending representation (Annexure P/3) for grant of compassionate appointment on account of the death of his father.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's father died in harness on 14.12.2011. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an application dated 16.07.2015 (Annexure P-3) seeking compassionate appointment. He submits that despite lapse of considerable time, the said application has neither been considered nor decided by the competent authority and no order has been passed thereon till date.

3. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3/Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur submits that if the application submitted by the petitioner is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within the stipulated period.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings as well as the documents appended with the writ petition.

5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the respondent Corporation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 & 3/Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur to consider and decide the pending application/representation (Annexure P/3) submitted by the petitioner for compassionate appointment and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top