SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 27303

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Vimal Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 10310 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mayank Chandrakar
For the Respondents: Sharad Mishra

The court directed the respondent authorities to consider and decide the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment on its own merit and in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within 30 days.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate Appointment - Pending Representation - Direction to decide - Where an application for compassionate appointment is pending, the appropriate authority should be directed to consider and decide the same on its own merit in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. (Para 4)

Issues: Whether the respondent authorities should be directed to decide the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment.

Digitally signed by ADITI ADITI DIWAN DIWAN KAIWART KAIWARTDate: 2026.08.24 17:06:24 +0530

NAFR

(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)

Order On Board

1. Heard.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to issue an appointment order in his favour on compassionate grounds, instead of in favour of respondent No. 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s father died in harness on 19.06.2019 and the petitioner preferred an application vide Annexure P/3 before the respondent authority for grant of compassionate appointment but the same is pending consideration till date.

4. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Respondent No. 5 shall also be at liberty to make a representation before the respondent authority prior to the passing of the order.

5. With the aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of.

@d!t!

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top