HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Akhilesh Beohar, J
Bhikham Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 684 of 2026
Digitally signed by AKHILESH AKHILESH BEOHARBEOHAR Date:2026.09. 1717:28:09 +0530 CGHC010091562026
Heard on admission.
The appeal is admitted for hearing.
Also heard on I.A. No.01 of 2026, application under Section 430 of BNSS for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.
By the impugned judgment dated 26.02.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), District Mahasamund, C.G. in Sessions Trial No. H-19/2024, the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:
| Conviction | Sentence |
|---|---|
| Under Section 376 of IPC | Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine amount to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for three months |
| Under Section 506 of IPC | Rigorous Imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine amount to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for one month |
Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the FIR was lodged after a delay of 15 days from the date of incident. The victim herself has stated that she voluntarily accompanied the appellant. She had neither raised any alarm nor sought help from anyone. He further submits that although the incident was alleged to have taken place at Joshi Lodge, but the register of the said lodge does not conclusively establish that the victim had stayed there along with the appellant. Conviction of the appellant is not
[[IMG_1]] [[IMG_2]]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.