SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6317

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Manju Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent


ORDER

(30.12.2020)

1. The issues under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated 17.11.2018 include non-receipt of the following information raised by the appellant through her RTI application dated 27.08.2018 and first appeal dated 12.10.2018:- (i) ािथनी के KCC खाता संा XXXXXXXXXX305 म िदनांक १३.०३.२०१६ को बकाया धनरािश िकतनी थी I (ii) उपरो( KCC खाता संा म िव*ीय वष २०१६-१७ के दौरान /रपेमे0 ािथनी 1ारा िकतना िकया गया है I (iii) फसल ऋण मोचन योजना अंतगत ािथनी उपरो( विणत खाते म िकतनी धनरािश के मोचन हेतु ा= है I (iv) ािथनी 1ारा फसल ऋण मोचन पोटल पर दज कराये गये िशकायत संा १७१७९०००४६५८ म OS-RP बGक ऑफ़ बडौदा गोसाईगंज शाखा 1ारा िकतना धनरािश भरा गया है I (v) उ( िशकायत म SERCH STATUS िकस अिधकारी 1ारा भरा गया सRंिधत अिधकारी का नाम पद एवं पTाचार का पता I

2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the appellant filed an application dated 27.08.2018 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Bank of Baroda, Regional office, Sultanpur, seeking aforesaid information. The CPIO vide letter dated 28.09.2018 replied to the appellant. Dissatisfied with this, the appellant filed first appeal dated 12.10.201


    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top