CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
NATARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) – Respondent
O R D E R
1. The appellant filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Chennai. The appellant seeking information is as under:-
1. Please furnish Lakshmi Service Station at Kooteripattu managed by Dealer Natarajan is Do Do(i,e Company Owned Dealer Operated Outlet) or Do Do (Dealer Owned Dealer Operated Outlet)
2. Please furnish attested copy of dealership agreement executed between IOCL and the dealer Mr. Natarajan from 1989 to till date
3. Please furnish, policy related to DoDo. Even though there is a valid lease agreement for 10 years, and the Do Do dealership is terminated, after taking the underground tanks, delivery pumps, whether site will be handed over to the land owner?
4. In Page no.12 of dealership agreement executed between IOCL and Lakshmi Service Station, it’s mentioned, all disputes related to dealership agreement should be referred to IOCL's arbitrator. In my case, Arbitrator and High Court issued judgment in my favor and asked me to submit retail outlet restoration requisition application to IOCL. But, IOCL didn’t consider Arbitration judgment and denied my
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.