SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2199

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Jagdish Chander – Appellant
Versus
KALAWATI SARAN CHILDRENS HOSPITAL NEW DELHI – Respondent


ORDER

FACTS

The Appellant vide RTI application sought information, as under:-

Dissatisfied due to non-receipt of any reply from the PIO, the Appellant, approahced the FAA. The FAA vide order dated 12.04.2023, directed the PIO to provide the point-wise reply to the appellant within 10 days.

Thereafter, the Appellant filed a Second Appeal before the Commission.

HEARING:

Facts emerging during the hearing:

The following were present:

Appellant: The appellant attended the hearing through AC.

Respondent: The respondent Shri R.P. Gupta, EE (Bldg.) attended the hearing in person.

The appellant’s 59 cases were scheduled for hearing on 13.10.2023, at 10:15 AM, at the Central Information Commission (CIC). The hearing notices had been duly delivered to the appellant on 04.10.2023 (as per the Indian Post website). However, the appellant informed via telephone that he was unable to present his case due to an urgent matter scheduled at the Hon’ble Tis Hazari Courts. Subsequently, the appellant's son visited the CIC in person, informing that his father was occupied at the Hon’ble Tis Hazari Courts, although he lacked the hearing notice or any proof related to the hearing in the Hon’ble Court. Despite this,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top