SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 1247

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Ashish Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Department – Respondent


Information sought:

The Complainant/Appellant filed an RTI application dated 06.09.2023 (online) seeking the following information:

“Applicant have submitted the attached complaint to SDM dwarka with DD no(59071 on date 4th sept 23) against two notary officials for enquiry.

Applicant want the reply as per rti act

1) applicant want the certified copy of both agreement which are attached with complaint and attested by two Notary officer along with all documents, registers, receipt number etc where notary officer have entered the business transaction entry as per mentioned notary after attasted. details are below-

A) Will agreement attested by surinder Kumar F17/5/84 on dated 12/09/2006

B) Family settlement agreement attested by rajendra jeet singh 072/06 on date 18/06/2010

2) Applicant want to know why both notary official have not entered all the entries after attasted from them in their database as per law. Applicant want the know the list of documents point wise along with their certified copy of all the documents/register/Note book/receipt number point wise which have used for record the transaction after attested

3) applicant want the reason for not mentioning the entry after attested t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top