O R D E R

FACTS

The Appellant vide her RTI application sought information in reference to her letter dated 24.07.2018; she requested to give her a reply as furnished in response to the above letter, etc.

The CPIO, vide letter dated 14.09.2018 provided the information to the Appellant as under:-

“In inviting a kind reference to your RTI application, the information as sought for by you under RTI Act-2005 may be treated as "NIL" form this division. Sri A K Nayak, Sr. SPOs Cuttack City Division, Cuttack has since been relieved on 31.05.2018 (Afternoon) and presently working as SSRM RMS 'N' Division, Cuttack and he is not able to supply the relevant information related to Cuttack City Division.

Dissatisfied with the reply received from the PIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal. The FAA, vide order dated 18.03.2019, upheld the reply of the CPIO. Thereafter, the Appellant filed a Second Appeal before the Commission with a request to provide information.

HEARING:

Facts emerging during the hearing:

The following were present:

Appellant: Absent;

Respondent: Absent;

Both the parties remained absent during the hearing. The Commission was however, in receipt of an email from the Appellant wherein she