CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
PANKAJ KHULLAR – Appellant
Versus
Central University of Punjab – Respondent
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 15.03.2023 seeking information on the following points:
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 19.04.2023 and the same is reproduced as under:-
3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 08.05.2023. The FAA vide order dated 26.06.2023 upheld the reply of CPIO.
4. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal dated NIL.
5. The Appellant remained absent during the hearing and on behalf of the Respondent, Robin Jindal, PRO & PIO; Sunil Mittal along with Rupinder, FAA attended the hearing in person.
6. The Respondent submitted that the information sought for at point no.1 of the RTI Application was provid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.