CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Mohit Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
के (cid:574)ीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:330),मुिनरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:671)ी, New Delhi – 110067 ि(cid:554)तीय अपील सं(cid:421)ा / Second Appeal No. CIC/BKOBD/A/2024/116850 Mohit Mehta … अपीलकता(cid:330)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO: Bank of Baroda Mumbai …(cid:366)ितवादीगण/Respondent Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:
Date of Decision: 03.03.2025 CORAM:
RTI : 13.02.2024
FA : 03.03.2024
SA : 22.05.2024
CPIO : 01.03.2024
FAO : 06.03.2024
Hearing : 19.02.2025
Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 13.02.2024 seeking information on the following points:
1. “As per bank of baroda rules/policy and under sarfasi Act 2002. Bank of baroda authorized officer prepare inventory or not of belonging, which are kept in mortgage property before to take possession, 2. As per bank of baroda rules/policy and under sarfasi Act 2002. Bank would have any kind of rights on auction sold property after issued sale certificate and possession handed over to highest bidder, 3. Does the Bank of baroda authorized officer after complete procedure and complete all formalities, iss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.