CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
MAHESH BHAGERIA – Appellant
Versus
United Commercial Bank (UCO) – Respondent
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 12.12.2022 seeking information on the following points:
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 31.12.2022 and the same is reproduced as under:- “The sought information pertains to third party hence exempted from disclosure u/s 8 (1)(j) & (e) of the RTI Act, 2005.”
3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 09.01.2023 alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 16.01.2023 upheld the reply of CPIO.
4. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal dated 27.02.2023. 5. The appellant remained absent and on behalf of the respondent Ms. Neha Gupta, CPIO, attended the hearing in-person.
6. The respondent while defending their case inter alia submitted that the information i.e. personal details of staff members delegated with election duties (for MCD elections) was exempted under the provisions of Section 8 (1) (e) & (j) of the RTI Act.
7.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.