CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
N/A, N/A
Chintan Mehta – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, Association of Indian Universities – Respondent
O R D E R
Information sought:
The Appellant filed an online RTI Application dated 16.09.2021 seeking information on the following one point:
1) “PDF copy of ALL AIU (Equivalence Committee) Minutes of Meeting which have held from 01/01/2020 to 16/09/2021.”
The CPIO vide online reply dated 13.10.2021, informed to the Appellant as under:
“You may please come to AIU office for inspect the Minutes. Please intimate the date atleast 2 days before the inspection.”
Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 13.10.2021. The First Appellate Authority vide online reply dated 22.10.2021, informed as under:

Grounds for Second Appeal:
The Appellant filed a Second Appeal u/s 19 of the Act on the ground of unsatisfactory reply furnished by the Respondent. Appellant requested the Commission to direct the CPIO to provide information sought for.
Submissions made by Appellant and Respondent during Hearing:
The representative of the Appellant stated that he has not received the requisite information as sought in the instant RTI Application from the Respondent.
The Commission interjected and quizzed the representative of the Appellant to establish the larger public interest in seeking such sort of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.