CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Raju Dajiba Ingale – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL RAILWAY – Respondent
O R D E R
Information sought:
The Appellant filed an RTI Application dated 20.12.2018 seeking information as under:
The CPIO vide letter dated 28.01.2019, transferred the instant RTI application u/s 6(3) to Dy. CE(PL/Const.), CAO (Const.), 6th Floor, New Annex Bldg., Mumbai CST and endorsed a copy of the same to the Appellant. Further, a letter dated 27.02.2019 endorsed by Shri Rajesh Upadhyay, Dy. CE(C) PL/APIO(C) informed the Appellant that the information sought is not clear and accordingly their office is not in a position to furnish the relevant information. Being dissatisfied, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 07.01.2019. The First Appellate Authority vide order dated 07.02.2019, upheld the CPIO’s reply dated 28.01.2019 and also enclosed a copy of this letter.
Grounds for Second Appeal:
The Appellant filed a Second Appeal u/s 19 of the Act on the ground of unsatisfactory reply furnished by the Respondent. He requested the Commission to direct the CPIO to provide complete information sought for.
Submissions made by Appellant and Respondent during Hearing:
The Appellant did not participate despite being served the hearing notice.
The Respondent reiterated the contents of the wr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.