CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
MRITUNJAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
United Commercial Bank (UCO) – Respondent
ORDER
(04.02.2021)
1. The issues under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated 16.12.2018 include non-receipt of the following information raised by the appellant through his RTI application dated 25.10.2018 and first appeal dated 08.11.2018:-
i. Opening balance of the appellant’s account no. **********6894 on date 11 Oct, 12 Oct 2018.
ii. Was the cheque has been bounced due to insufficient of the fund?
iii. Was the cheque bounce due to signature mismatch?
iv. Proper reason for bouncing of the cheque.
v. Name of the clearing branch.
vi. Was charges deducted in behalf of the bounced cheque?
vii. Name of the clearing officer with the designation.
viii. Code of conduct no in return memo.
2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the appellant filed an application dated 25.10.2018 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), UCO Bank, Burdwan, seeking aforesaid information. The CPIO replied on 03.11.2018. Dissatisfied with the response of the CPIO, the appellant filed first appeal dated 08.11.2018. The First Appellate Authority (FAA)disposed of the first appeal vide its order dated 29.11.2018. Aggrieved by this, the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.