SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2106

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
MRITUNJAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
United Commercial Bank (UCO) – Respondent


ORDER

(04.02.2021)

1. The issues under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated 16.12.2018 include non-receipt of the following information raised by the appellant through his RTI application dated 25.10.2018 and first appeal dated 08.11.2018:-

i. Opening balance of the appellant’s account no. **********6894 on date 11 Oct, 12 Oct 2018.

ii. Was the cheque has been bounced due to insufficient of the fund?

iii. Was the cheque bounce due to signature mismatch?

iv. Proper reason for bouncing of the cheque.

v. Name of the clearing branch.

vi. Was charges deducted in behalf of the bounced cheque?

vii. Name of the clearing officer with the designation.

viii. Code of conduct no in return memo.

2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the appellant filed an application dated 25.10.2018 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), UCO Bank, Burdwan, seeking aforesaid information. The CPIO replied on 03.11.2018. Dissatisfied with the response of the CPIO, the appellant filed first appeal dated 08.11.2018. The First Appellate Authority (FAA)disposed of the first appeal vide its order dated 29.11.2018. Aggrieved by this, the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top