SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 5

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
Neeraj Gupta – Appellant
Versus
National Institute of Open Schooling – Respondent


ORDER

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 20.04.2023 seeking the following information:

     Provide the question paper with question series code no: NIOSHQ010001015016 of On Demand Exam of Secondary (10th) of subject – Mathematics (211) which was conducted on 12th January 2023(Thursday). My required registration details including student hall ticket and student identity card are hereby enclosed with this letter.

2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 01.06.2023 and the same is reproduced as under:- “It is to inform you that, this type of information is exempted from disclosure under section 8 (1) (d) of the RTI Act, 2005.”

3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 14.07.2023 alleging that the reply given by the CPIO was incomplete, false and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 01.09.2023 upheld the reply of CPIO.

4. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal dated 14.11.2023.

5. The appellant and on behalf of the respondent Shri V. Sathish, Assistant Director, attended the hearing in-person.

6. The appellant inter alia submitted that the appellant did not reply wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top