CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
Neeraj Gupta – Appellant
Versus
National Institute of Open Schooling – Respondent
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 20.04.2023 seeking the following information:
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 01.06.2023 and the same is reproduced as under:- “It is to inform you that, this type of information is exempted from disclosure under section 8 (1) (d) of the RTI Act, 2005.”
3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 14.07.2023 alleging that the reply given by the CPIO was incomplete, false and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 01.09.2023 upheld the reply of CPIO.
4. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal dated 14.11.2023.
5. The appellant and on behalf of the respondent Shri V. Sathish, Assistant Director, attended the hearing in-person.
6. The appellant inter alia submitted that the appellant did not reply wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.