O R D E R

FACTS The Appellant vide RTI application sought information, as under:- The CPIO vide letter dated03.08.2021furnished a reply to the Appellant. Dissatisfied with the reply of the CPIO, the Appellant approached the FAA.The order of the FAA, if any, is not on the record of the Commission. Thereafter, the Appellant filed a Second Appeal before the Commission.

HEARING:

Facts emerging during the hearing:

The following were present:

Appellant: The appellant attended the hearing in person.

Respondent: The respondent Shri Ashok Daryani, PIO/SDM (HQ) attended the hearing in person.

The Appellant reiterated the contents of the RTI application and submitted that no response was furnished to him by the CPIO. The appellant further stated that the association takes grants and subsidies from various govt offices under GNCTD viz Delhi Park and Garden Society under Deptt of Environment and also under Bhagidari Scheme and under various schemes run by Govt of NCT of Delhi where public money is being paid to said RWA, and therefore it involves a larger public interest as public money is been paid to this RWA and that public money belongs to all the citizen of entire Delhi State and which is being n