O R D E R

FACTS The Appellant vide RTI application sought information regarding forms and documents submitted for obtaining death claim of Appellant’s husband Late Madan Lal against various LIC policies.

The Manager (CRM/PIO) vide letter dated 22.07.2022 furnished a reply to the Appellant. Dissatisfied with the reply of the CPIO, the Appellant approached the FAA.The FAA vide order dated 28.09.2022, furnished a reply to the Appellant and disposed off the Appeal.

Thereafter, the Appellant filed a Second Appeal before the Commission.

HEARING:

Facts emerging during the hearing:

The following were present: Appellant: Present in Person Respondent: MrRajesh Tikoo Manager CRM, Present in Person The appellant, while reiterating the contents of the RTI application, submitted that no information has been furnished to her so far. She submitted that this RTI Application was filed to seek information regarding the policy claim of her deceased husband. She further stated that the CPIO has wrongly denied the information, citing Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005, as she is the class I legal heir of the deceased husband and therefore is not a third party. She stated that she was the second wife of the