SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 903

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
SUGAN CHANDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Steel – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), M/o. Steel, New Delhi seeking following information:-

“Please refer to RTI Application MOSTL/R/2018/50016 and communication dated 12-03-2018 stating that the information cannot be provided at this stage under Section 8(1)(h) of RTI Act. Hopefully the investigation must have been over as vigilance investigations are to be concluded within 6 months as per manual. Hence, kindly provide investigation and action taken report on the complaint dated 03-02-2017 and forwarded to ministry of steel by CVC on 06-04-2017, as informed to applicant by CVC on 05-02-2018. (The copies of all these letters were enclosed to RTI Application MOSTL/R/2018/50016).”

2. The CPIO responded on 20-02-2019. The appellant filed the first appeal dated 18-03-2019 which was disposed of by the first appellate authority on 15- 04-2019. Thereafter, he filed a second appeal u/Section 19(3) of the RTI Act before the Commission requesting to take appropriate legal action against the CPIO u/Section 20 of the RTI Act, 2005 and also to direct him to provide the sought for informat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top