CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
S S Singh – Appellant
Versus
UT of Andaman & Nicobar – Respondent
ORDER
FACTS
The Appellant vide his RTI application sought information, as under:-
“Furnish the CCTV footage of the official training provided to Lab Assistant promoted from Lab Attendant under taken by ANIIMS / DHS Port Blair in his different capacity from during 1st April to 30th June 2018. The information to be contain with CCTV Footage of OPD camera, blood bank nearby camera, nearby camera of Room No. 29 and auditorium camera.”
The CPIO and Assistant Director (Admn.) vide letter dated 30.10.2018 transferred the RTI application to PIO/OSD (ANIIMS), DHS, Port Blair. Dissatisfied due to non-receipt of any response from the PIO/OSD (ANIIMS), DHS, Port Blair, the Appellant approached the FAA. The FAA vide order dated 07.01.2019 directed the PIO, ANIIMS to provide the requisite available information to the Appellant. The Compliance of FAA order, if any, is not thereon record.Thereafter, the Appellant filed a Second Appeal before the Commission with a request to provide information and impose penalty on the CPIO.
HEARING:
Facts emerging during the hearing:
The following were present:
Appellant: Absent
Respondent: Shri Sujit Kumar Mazudar, Section Incharge Legal Cell through Audio Conferencing.
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.