SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 5528

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, Commissioner
Ramchet R Yadav – Appellant
Versus
CPIO: Punjab National Bank Mumbai – Respondent
Second Appeal No. CIC/PNBNK/A/2023/121400



RTI denials for internal circulars invalid without Section 8 exemptions; third-party beneficiary lists exempt under S.8(1)(j); sever per S.10.

Headnote:The appellant sought information under the RTI Act regarding cheque return charges, conditions for cheque returns despite sufficient balance, special schemes for One Time Settlement (OTS) of Non-Performing Assets since 1st April 2011, and lists of OTS beneficiaries. Relevant provisions include Sections 2(f), 8(1), 8(1)(j), and 10 of the RTI Act. The CPIO and FAA denied information citing internal correspondence without invoking exemptions. The Commission found partial responses inadequate. Key issues: Whether denial of circulars/orders on OTS schemes and beneficiary lists was justified; if queries were clarifications or information under RTI Act. Ratio: Denials without invoking Section 8(1) exemptions invalid; third-party beneficiary details exempt under Section 8(1)(j); circulars on OTS not deniable as internal; sever per Section 10. Appeal partly allowed; respondent directed to provide OTS circulars after severing exempt information within 15 days; CPIO to explain hearing absence.

Table of Content
1. rti application details and cpio/faa responses (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. hearing proceedings and appellant submissions (Para 5 , 6)
3. rti exemptions, severance, and directions (Para 7)

ORDER

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 10.10.2022 seeking information on the following points:

 “Regarding Cheque Return/Cheque bounce Charges & all Circulars/Orders issued by PNB board in Special Scheme for One Time Settlement (OTS) of Non-Performing Assets since 1st April, 2011 till date.

(i) As per bank rules Pl. explain in details, what is meant by Cheque bounce/ Cheque Return & whether the Bank Charges for the same. If yes, Pl. provide certified copies of all circulars issued by competent authority of Punjab National Bank for the same.

(ii) If the customer have sufficient balance in his account in such circumstance under what condition the customer's cheque may be returned by the banker.

(iii) Since 1st April, 2011 till date, how many times Board of Punjab National Bank has come out with the Special Scheme for One Time Settlement (OTS) of Non- Performing Assets (NPA). Pl. Provide certified copies all the Circulars/Orders issued by Competent Authorities of PNB for the same.

(iv) Pl. Provide certified copy of lists of all eligible OTS beneficiaries from 01/4/2011 till date.”

2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 09.11.2022 and the same is reproduced as under :-

“The information sought is an internal correspondence/communication. Hence cannot be provided.”

3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 29.12.2022 alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 16.01.2023 and the same is reproduced as under:-

(i) “(a) As per Bank rules, Cheque bounce/Cheque return means a Cheque that is not paid by the financial institution on which it was drawn. The usual reason for a returned Cheque is that the account on which it was drawn does not contain enough funds to pay for the full amount of the Cheque.

(b) Cheque returning charges are levied as per Banks internal guidelines from time to time.

(c) Certified Copies of all Circulars cannot be provided as the information sought is an internal correspondence/communication.

(ii) There are different circumstances under which the cheque may be returned if the customer have sufficient balance in his account. The different reasons are given below-

1. Effects not cleared, present again

2. Exceeds Arrangement

3. Refer to drawer

4. Kindly contact drawer/Drawee Bank and please present again.

5. Drawer’s Signature Incomplete.

6. Drawer's Signature Illegible.

7. Drawer's Signature differs.'/

8. Drawer’s Signature required.

9. Drawer's Signature not as per mandate:

10. Drawer’s Signature to operate account not- received.

11. Alteration require drawer’s authentication.

12. Payment stopped by drawer.

13. Instrument Postdated.

14. Instrument out dated/stale

15. Instrument undated /without proper date.

16. Cheque irregularly drawn/amount in words and figures differ.

17. Payee's endorsement required.

18. Alteration on instrument-other than-"Date”

19. Fake/Forged/Stolen-draft/Cheque/cash Order/interest warrant/dividend warrant.

20. Payment stopped by attachment order.

21. Payment stopped by court order.

22. Withdrawal stopped owing to death of account holder.

23. Withdrawal stopped owing to lunacy of account holder.

24. Withdrawal stopped owing to insolvency of account holder.

25. Wrongly delivered /not drawn on us.

26. Account closed

27. Title of account required.

28. No such account.

29. Other reasons.

The above mentioned are some of the reasons on which the cheque may be returned. However, there are various reasons for which the cheque can be returned depending on the different circumstances.

(iii) The information sought is an internal correspondence/communication. Hence, cannot be provided.

(iv) The information sought is an internal correspondence/communication. Hence cannot be provided.”

4. Aggrieved with the FAA’s order, the App

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top