SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3838

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
P R Adikesavan – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


O R D E R

(05.06.2023)

1. The issue under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated 24.10.2021 include non-receipt of the following information sought by the appellant through the RTI application dated 04.07.2021 and first appeal dated 12.09.2021:- (i) Whether Catinat Carpourame Soupparyar, an officer of PNB Mudaliyapet Branch, Pondicherry had applied for permission and obtained the same from his employer the PNB before accepting to be the agent and executing Doc No. 2404.2007-S.R.O. Annanagar Chennai as power agent as per the service rules of the Public Sector Banks (PNB) ?

(ii) Whether after executing the sale deed doc no. 2404/2007 and on receipt of the above said 9 DD’s and 1 cheque in his favour on PNB Periamet, Chennai intimated the same to his employer PNB, Mudaliapet, Pondicherry ?

(iii) Furnish the name or names of the purchasers of these 9 PNB Demand Drafts (iv) Furnish the information whether the person or persons paid through cash or cheques while purchasing these 9 PNB DDs (v) Furnish the name of the Drawer of the PNB cheque No. ****38.

(vi) Whether these 9 PNB DDs and 1 PNB cheques were encashed by Catinat Carpourame Souppararyar?

(vii) If so furnish the date of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top