O R D E R

(04.10.2023)

1. The issue under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated Nil include non-receipt of the following information sought by the appellant through the RTI application dated 18.09.2021 and first appeal dated 22.11.2021-  In the matter of charge sheet served to vide letter RO/KOLM/HRD/DAD/2017.18/02/369 dated 16.02.2018 and charge No 1(a) 3 the Inquiring Authority has stated the charge as Not Proved, but as a Disciplinary Authority Mr A K Arora, DGM, CO, Murnbal have quoted MEX

1.4 and stated the same as Proved:

(i) Please inform the grounds for stating the charge as Proved and also (ii) Inform whether the debit entry of Rs 8 Laths as mentioned in the charge sheet outstanding in BGL head No 52537015002

2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the appellant filed an application dated 18.09.2021 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Central Bank, Mumbai seeking aforesaid information. The CPIO vide letter dated 26.10.2021 replied to the appellant. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed first appeal dated 22.11.2021 The First Appellate Authority (FAA) vide order21.12.2021 replied to appell