SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2836

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
ROMIL CHHADVA – Appellant
Versus
Auroville Foundation – Respondent


ORDER

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 01.06.2023 seeking information on the following points:

    (i) Copies of contracts and memorandums of understanding insofar as they relate to work undertaken in Auroville by ITSP;
    (ii) Details of the tendering and selection process and its publication that led to the award of a contract to, or otherwise retention of, ITSP for work undertaken in Auroville.
    (iii) Details of payments made and to be made to ITSP for work undertaken in Auroville.
    (iv) Details of who is ultimately paying for the services of ITSP.
    (v) Instructions, Scope of Work and information given to ITSP for work in Auroville by CPWD and the AVF.
    (vi) Meeting minutes relating to work to be undertaken in Auroville by ITSP.

2. Having not received any response from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 19.07.2023. The FAA’s order, if any, is not available on record.

3. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 08.09.2023 and the same is reproduced as under:-

    ITSP was identified by CPWD as per their norms and procedures.

4. Aggrieved with the non-receipt of FAA’s order, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal dated Nil.

5. The appellant along wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top