CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, J
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Health Services Head Quarter – Respondent
Information sought:
The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 31.08.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:


The PIO furnished a reply to the complainant on 04.10.2023 stating as under:
“Ans 1.2 & 3 The RTI application cannot be processed as no specific information is seek by applicant under RTI Act, 2005.”
Being dissatisfied, the complainant filed a First Appeal dated NIL. The FAA vide its order dated 25.10.2023, held as under:
“The appeal was conducted on 25.10.2023, ACDMO(ND), APIO(RTI) DGHS and appellant were present in the appeal. CDMO (ND) is directed to provide the modified reply within 5 days to the appellant.
Order passed and appeal disposed of accordingly.”
In compliance of FAA’s order, the PIO furnished a revised point-wise reply to the appellant on 31.10.2023 and denied the information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act read with section 2.2 chapter 2 of CODE OF MEDICAL ETHICS REGULATIONS, 2002.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, complainant approached the Commission with the instant Complaint.
A written submission dated 17.03.2025 (copy marked to the complainant) has been filed by the respondent, which is taken on record. Contents of the same are reproduced bel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.