SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 12882

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Sangram Keshari Badajena – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India – Respondent


ORDER

(20.12.2022)

1. The issue under consideration arising out of the second appeal dated 19.03.2021 include non-receipt of the following information sought by the appellant through the RTI application dated 01.12.2020 and first appeal dated 20.01.2021 :-

(i) “Loan statement of Cust ID-xxxxx8185 from account opening to closing.

(ii) Both term loan and working capital loan statement of Account No.xxxxx 0004 Cust ID-xxxxx8185.

(iii) How the loan Account is closed with outstanding amount? i.e.Rs.11,71,344. Is there any break law ?

(iv) How is it possible once loan account is closed without paying rest dues?

(v) If Account is closed, then why the Rice mill document is not released yet?”

2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the appellant filed an application dated 01.12.2020 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Bank of India, Bhubaneswar, seeking aforesaid information. The CPIO vide letter dated 02.01.2021 replied to the appellant. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed first appeal dated 20.01.2021. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) vide order dated 01.02.2021 disposed of the first appeal. Aggrieved by that, the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top