CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
VIVEK – Appellant
Versus
Northern Railway – Respondent
O R D E R
FACTS The Appellant vide RTI application sought information, as under:- 1. Details in the following format regarding all letters dispatched/sent from e- office account of Sh. Dharamveer, Steno/Sr. DSTE/UMB from 1/4/2021 to30/6/2022.
Receipt No. Subject Sender Sent By Sent On
2. Photocopies of all letters details of which are mentioned in para 1 above.
3. Photocopy of Movement details (downloaded from e-office account of Dharamveer, Steno/Sr. DSTE/UMB) of every receipt/letter sent from e-office account which is mentioned in para 1 above.
4. Photocopy of complete (noting and correspondence side both are required) e- office file of OT-42 and OT-43 tenders awarded to firm M/S E-Sonic Enterprises- Sangrur.
5. Photocopy of Movement details (downloaded from e-office account of DSTE/UMB and Sr. DSTE/UMB) of e-office file as mentioned in para 4 above.
6. Photocopy of complete physical files for OT-42 and OT-43 of tenders awarded to firm M/S E-Sonic Enterprises-Sangrur.
The ADSTE/Tele/UMB cum CPIO vide letter dated 14.09.2022 furnished a reply to the Appellant. Dissatisfied with the reply of the CPIO, the Appellant approached the FAA.The APIO vide order dated 14.10.2022, furnished a point-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.