SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 4664

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
VISHIST VARMA – Appellant
Versus
United Commercial Bank (UCO) – Respondent


O R D E R

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 01.07.2022 seeking the following information regarding saving account no. 0277010000XXXX and locker no. 3A, LF01A/108 on the following points:-

1. How many times should the account holder visit the bank to collect the cheque book and return without getting it from the bank officers, please inform.

2. Please inform if RBI has instructed UCO Bank not to send cheque book by Speed post but are to be personally collected. Please provide the RBI Circular in this respect.

3. When the account shows a balance of Rs. 4660.37 as on 15-04-2017, are the account Holders not entitled to have a cheque book. Please provide the RBI Circular that specifies the minimum balance for issue of Cheque book.

4. Why did the branch NOT respond to the handwritten note and the cited email(s) promptly but referred to remain silent.

5. What is the reason for the branch not to give the account closing from(s) when asked for personally and also vide emails dated 30-05-2019 & 02- 08-2021…”

2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 28.09.2022 and the same is reproduced as under:-

“Point (1) - Deposit Policy 2021-22 states as under Delivery of cheque book at the Doorstep o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top