Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
ANANDI RAMALINGAM, J
Kabita Kumari Shaw – Appellant
Versus
Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's rti application details (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appeal process and dissatisfaction (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. hearing and representation by parties (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's directive on cpio response (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 18.03.2024 seeking information on the following points:
I, Kabita Kumari Shaw, Enrollment no: 2353422443, Course DECE, RC: KOLKATTA, Part of the Final Year Seeking Information Under Right to Information Act 2005.
1. Provide me the copy of Training / Placement / Acknowledgement letter from the University giving permission to do the project in the school which Comes under my Study Center, Paper Code DECE-4
2. Provide me the Name of the Academic Counsellor and Guide respectively along with Contact number against the paper code, DECE -4
3. Provide me Copy Attendance Schedule For Academic Counsellor and guide for April 2024 and May 2024 in Study Center against paper code DECE-4
4. If these Paper Code – DECE-4 Contains synopsis in the project then please provide me mail id to approve the synopsis
5. What will be the Academic qualification of guide which the IGNOU/University Provide against Paper Code –DECE-4
2. The CPIO repl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
