CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Information Commissioner
Dharmender Singh – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, CP Division No. 3, Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
Information sought:
The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 14.07.2022 seeking the following information:



Having not received any response from the CPIO, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 24.08.2022. The FAA order is not on record.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.
Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing on 09.01.2024:
The following were present:-
Appellant: Present through Video-Conference.
Respondent: Amit Kumar, SDO & ACPIO present through Video-Conference.
The Commission has passed the following observations and directions on 12.01.2024:
“The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing both the parties and perusal of the records, observes that the Appellant is aggrieved that complete and correct information was not provided to him as per his RTI application.
As per the submissions of the Appellant, he is satisfied with the response given by the Respondent on point Nos. 6, 7 and 10 of the RTI application. Upon perusal of the records, the Commission observes that the response given by the Respondent on point Nos. 1, 2 and 11 of the RTI application are satisfactory, as informat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.