Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, Commissioner
Nallamsetti Siva Prasad Babu – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Hyderabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's rti request on misappropriation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondent's defense on information exemption. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observation on information disclosure. (Para 7) |
| 4. final decision to dismiss the appeal. (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 01.01.2024 seeking information on the following points:
1. I came to know that Sri Sundarapalli Mehar Baba (ex-staff supervising worked in your bank) was terminated from your bank services vide final order No. DMHUB(S)/AMA/KNR/2021-22/1318, dated 21/08/2021 issued by disciplinary authority, discipline management hub (south) Chennai, due to he received borrower's loan proceeds to his accounts through suppliers/intermediaries accounts, misappropriated public/customers money, and incurred financial and reputational loss to your bank while he was working in your Rangampeta branch, East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh.
Now I request you to advise me the total amount of public money was misappropriated by him and how much amount of public/customer money misappropriated was recovered from his superannuation benefits till now.
2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 08.01.2024 and the same is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
