Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Information Commissioner
Namoram Meena – Appellant
Versus
CPIO, MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICE (HQ) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti application filing and initial responses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent's defense and submitted documents. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's findings on cpio's obligations. (Para 6 , 7) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/MESER/A/2024/608192 Namoram Meena .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम CPIO, MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICE (HQ), ENGINEER IN CHIEF BRANCH, KASHMIR HOUSE, RAJAJI MARG, NEW DELHI-110011 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 01.07.2025 Date of Decision : 04.07.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 14.10.2023 CPIO replied on : 10.01.2024 First appeal filed on : 21.01.2024 First Appellate Authority’s order : 22.02.2024 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 25.02.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 14.10.2023 (online) seeking the following information:
“(a) Action taken report on my factual application bearing No NRM/PC/02/Pers dt 17 Jun 2023 sent via Regd Post No RE899358345IN to the Liaison Officer Special Reservation Cell Military Engineer Services, E-In-Cs Br Kashmir House Rajaji Marg, New Delhi-110011 (
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
