CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Phool Chand Meena – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Jal Board – Respondent
CIC/DELJB/A/2024/105326
के (cid:3)ीय सूचना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग(cid:18), मुिनरका
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/DELJB/A/2024/105326 Phool Chand Meena .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम PIO, ZRO (SW)- III, DELHI JAL BOARD, SECTOR-VII, RK PURAM, NEW DELHI – 110022 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 27.06.2025 Date of Decision : 04.07.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 09.05.2023 CPIO replied on : 15.06.2023 First appeal filed on : 19.10.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : Not on record
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 16.02.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 09.05.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:
“(cid:1)नवेदन इस (cid:8)कार है (cid:14)क मझु े सरकार(cid:18) आवास (cid:20)याटर नंबर 89, tiलॉक एफ, नानकपरूा नई !द"ल(cid:18) म# !दनांक 27.08.20 को आवं!टत हुआ था. !दनाकं 03.09.2020 को मैने इसे (cid:14)फजीकल(cid:18) )प से कtiजा (cid:14)कया था तथा !दनाकं
05.11.2020 को जल बोड+ 650 )पये जमा करा कर, मीटर लेकर नल कनै(cid:20)सन करवाया था। इसके प-चात मझु (cid:8)ाथ/ के पास 04 0सत1बर 2021 से 30 अ(cid:20)टूबर
कृपया सचू ना फूल चFद मीणा, गहृ मंHालय, जनगणना =वभाग सी. आर. एस. (cid:8)भाग, दसू र(cid:18) मंजील, वेBट tiलॉक 1, आर. के. पुरम नई !द"ल(cid:18) - 110066 पते पर
0भजवाने क5 मेहरबानी कर#।
क5 कृपा कर#।
(cid:8)मा?णत सJया=पत (cid:8)(cid:1)त0ल=प !दलवाने क5 मेहरबानी कर#।
मेहरबानी कर#। 3
क5 गयी कार+वाई क5 िBथ(cid:1)त के बारे बताय (cid:14)क कहां तक कार+वाई क5 गयी।
=वल1ब के कारणL क5 जानकार(cid:18) !दलवाने क5 कृपा कर#।
6. !दनांक 11.11.2021, 25.11.2021 व 15.03.2022 के पH पर =वल1ब करने
वाले अ6धकार(cid:18) का नाम व पदनाम क5 जानकार(cid:18) !दलवानी क5 मेहरबानी करे।”
2. The CPIO furnished a point-wise reply to the Appellant on 15.06.2023 stating as under:
“1. Bill copy attached.
2. The water bill generated for the period 04.09.2021 to 30.10.2021, in this bill addition adjustment amount of Rs-20813/- were added which were related to previous allottee Sh. Rohtash.
3. As above.
4. All three letters were processed.
5. As above facts no action is required on all three letters mentioned in R.T.I
6. Not required.
Note: In this regard you have already been informed in your previous R.T.I., I.D. No- 849 on dated-16.11.2022, vide this office reply dated 07.12.2022. Once again it is assured that the amount showing in the bills are concerned to previous allottee and it is also assured to you that you will not be asked for payment of this amount (16590 + LPSC thereon), at the time of giving N.O.C.”
3. Being dissatisfied, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 19.10.2023.
The FAA order is not on record.
4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.
Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:
The following were present:- Appellant: Present in person.
Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar, Additiona
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.