Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Information Commissioner
Aaman Gaurav – Appellant
Versus
PIO Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Central District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainant's application for caste certificates and subsequent complaint process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. cic's role regarding malafide actions and reasonings in the absence of information. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. final observations and caution regarding the conduct of the pio. (Para 10 , 11) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/REVDP/C/2024/604359 Aaman Gaurav ….िशकायतकता(cid:18) /Complainant VERSUS बनाम PIO Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Central District, 14, Daryaganj, New Delhi – 110002 ….(cid:27)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 14.07.2025 Date of Decision : 14.07.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from complaint:
RTI application filed on : 23.10.2023 CPIO replied on : Not on record First appeal filed on : 28.11.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : Not on record
2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 01.02.2024 Information sought:
1. The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 23.10.2023 (online)
seeking the following information:
“1. I had applied for Issuance of Caste (SC) Certificates of my minor sons namely 1. EKALAVYA HARIT and ATHRV HARIT vide application nos. 90510000951164 & 90
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
